abdussalam@stmiki.ac.id +6281260272238 Online Submission Open
Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026) • Artikel
Open Access

Survei Kepuasan Mahasiswa terhadap Layanan Program Studi Magister Manajemen FEB Universitas Trisakti 2024/2025

Kristian Chandra
Universitas Trisakti image/svg+xml
Farah Margaretha
Universitas Trisakti image/svg+xml
B. Medina Nilasari
Universitas Trisakti image/svg+xml
Caroline Christy Layani
Universitas Trisakti image/svg+xml
Published: October 11, 2026 Pages: 49-65
Original Full-Text Article
Download published version for reading and archiving
Download PDF
Abstract

Student satisfaction is an important indicator in evaluating the quality of higher education services because it reflects the extent to which the services provided by the study program align with student expectations. Therefore, periodic evaluation is necessary as a basis for service improvement and quality enhancement. This study aims to analyze student satisfaction with the services provided by the Master of Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Trisakti University. The study employed a quantitative approach using a descriptive survey method. Primary data were collected through questionnaires distributed to active students who had received academic and non-academic services. Sampling was carried out using a purposive sampling technique, with 91 respondents from five study concentrations. The results show that, in general, students had a good level of satisfaction with the services provided by the study program, with an overall mean score of 3.52 on a 4-point scale. A total of 81.3% of respondents stated that they were satisfied, indicating that academic services, administration, student affairs, and facilities generally have supported the learning process. Nevertheless, several aspects still need improvement, especially the responsiveness of academic administrative services, accessibility of student activity facilities, and certain supporting facilities. This study concludes that the service quality of the Master of Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Trisakti University, is generally in the good and satisfactory category; however, the survey results should be used continuously as a basis for service quality improvement.

Keywords:
Student Satisfaction Service Quality Survey; Higher Education Master of Management
Article Metrics & Downloads Graph
Monthly Download Trends:
Author Biographies
Kristian Chandra Universitas Trisakti

Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta Barat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, Indonesia.

Farah Margaretha Universitas Trisakti

Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta Barat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, Indonesia.

B. Medina Nilasari Universitas Trisakti

Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta Barat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, Indonesia.

Caroline Christy Layani Universitas Trisakti

Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta Barat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, Indonesia.

How to Cite
Chandra, K., Margaretha, F., Nilasari, B. M., & Layani, C. C. (2026). Survei Kepuasan Mahasiswa terhadap Layanan Program Studi Magister Manajemen FEB Universitas Trisakti 2024/2025. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Teknologi, 3(2), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.63447/jmt.v3i2.1988
License

This work is licensed under a Copyright (c) 2026 Kristian Chandra, Farah Margaretha, B. Medina Nilasari, Caroline Christy Layani .

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .

  • Share: You are free to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format.
  • Adapt: You are free to remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially.
  • Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
Copyright & Retention: Authors retain copyright without restrictions and grant this journal the right of first publication under an open-access model. The journal retains non-exclusive publishing rights for archiving, indexing, and scholarly dissemination.

References
Total: 25 References
  1. Alauddin, M., Ashman, A., Nghiem, S., & Lovell, K. (2017). What determines students’ expectations and preferences in university teaching and learning? An instrumental variable approach. Economic Analysis and Policy, 56, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2017.06.002
  2. Amiri, M., Shahir-Roudi, E., Shahsavar, H., & Khosravi, A. (2025). Evaluation of educational services quality and its impact on students’ satisfaction and loyalty based on academic quality improvement program (AQIP) model. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), 1351. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07988-w
  3. Amoako, G. K., Ampong, G. O., Gabrah, A. Y. B., de Heer, F., & Antwi-Adjei, A. (2023). Service quality affecting student satisfaction in higher education institutions in Ghana. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2238468. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2238468
  4. Amoako, I., Anane, E., & Cobinnah, A. (2023). Mediating effect of hardiness in the nexus of service quality and students’ satisfaction of public universities in Ghana. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2276273. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2276273
  5. Bwachele, V. W., Chong, Y. L., & Krishnapillai, G. (2023). Perceived service quality and student satisfaction in higher learning institutions in Tanzania. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 444. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01913-6
  1. Chen, Q., Chen, N., & Yang, Y. (2023). The impact of college students’ perceived service quality in the context of regional integration of education. SAGE Open, 13(3), 21582440231197505. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231197505
  2. Deni, K., Kurniadi, D. A., Komariah, A., & Ali, E. Y. (2026). The impact of the implementation of the internal quality assurance system on student satisfaction in academic services. JTP-Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 28(1), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v28i1.66571
  3. Hamshire, C., Barrett, N., Langan, M., Harris, E., & Wibberley, C. (2017). Students’ perceptions of their learning experiences: A repeat regional survey of healthcare students. Nurse Education Today, 49, 168–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.019
  4. Haverila, M., Haverila, K., McLaughlin, C., & Arora, M. (2021). Towards a comprehensive student satisfaction model. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(3), 100558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100558
  5. Hossain, M. A., Wu, R., Kalam, A., Al Masud, A., Islam, T., & Nur Habib, S. (2025). The impact of higher education service quality on institutional image and student satisfaction: The role of institutional image as mediator. International Social Science Journal, 75(256), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12562
  6. Juniarta, G. A., Heryanda, K. K., & Suwena, K. R. (2025). Peran kualitas pelayanan, penggunaan teknologi informasi, dan harapan mahasiswa terhadap kepuasan mahasiswa di Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan. JWM (Jurnal Wawasan Manajemen, 13(3), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.20527/jwm.v13i3.384
  7. Kanwar, A., & Sanjeeva, M. (2022). Student satisfaction survey: A key for quality improvement in the higher education institution. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-022-00196-6
  8. Kasirun, K., Awalludin, A., Wiyono, S., & Salsabila, S. (2025). Academic service management and its impact on student satisfaction in higher education. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(4), 1131–1138. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i4.1291
  9. Langan, A. M., & Harris, W. E. (2024). Metrics of student dissatisfaction and disagreement: Longitudinal explorations of a national survey instrument. Higher Education, 87(2), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01004-0
  10. Marques, F., Hernández-Leo, D., & Castillo, C. (2025). Beyond bias in student satisfaction surveys: Exploring the role of grades and satisfaction with the learning design. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 14(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44322-025-00030-3
  11. Nuraeni, A., Lindasari, A., Rahmawati, R., Amalia, S. N. A., & Kholik, A. (2025). Analisis transformasi penjaminan mutu pendidikan tinggi berdasarkan tinjauan Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi No. 53 Tahun 2023. Karimah Tauhid, 4(6), 3756–3773.
  12. Princess, E. O., Richard, O., Mary, O. A., Eseoghene, K., & Obianuju, C. O. (2025). Developing a cybersecurity maturity model for fintech firms using predictive analytics. International Journal of Science and Technology, 8(1), 023–049.
  13. Rahmawati, R., Permana, J., Rahyasih, Y., Triatna, C., & Wahyuni, S. (2024). Evaluasi tingkat kepuasan mahasiswa Universitas Almuslim terhadap kualitas pelayanan pendidikan tinggi dengan model HEdPERF. JAMP: Jurnal Administrasi dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 7(4), 526–537.
  14. Sari, R. A., & Dirayati, F. (2024). Penilaian kinerja pengajaran dosen menggunakan hasil pengisian yang terkomputerisasi. Jurnal Sistem Informasi dan Manajemen Basis Data, 7(1), 26–36.
  15. Schijns, J. M. C. (2025). Perceived service quality and students’ satisfaction and recommendation willingness in higher education: Justification of a formative measurement approach using PLS-SEM. International Journal of Educational Studies, 8(4), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.53935/2641533x.v8i4.458
  16. Sunindijo, R. Y. (2016). Teaching first-year construction management students: Lessons learned from student satisfaction surveys. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 12(4), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2015.1121937
  17. Sutherland, D., Warwick, P., Anderson, J., & Learmonth, M. (2018). How do quality of teaching, assessment, and feedback drive undergraduate course satisfaction in UK business schools? A comparative analysis with nonbusiness school courses using the UK national student survey. Journal of Management Education, 42(5), 618–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562918787849
  18. Taufique, K. M. R., Sabbir, M. M., & Rabbanee, F. K. (2026). A guide to key decision criteria for Likert-scale use in survey research. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 45(5), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.70032
  19. Weerasinghe, I. S., & Fernando, R. L. (2017). Students’ satisfaction in higher education. SSRN.
  20. Wong, W. H., & Chapman, E. (2023). Student satisfaction and interaction in higher education. Higher Education, 85(5), 957–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00874-0
Similar Articles

Articles sharing related keywords and machine learning classifications:

Pengaruh Iklan, Citra Merek, dan Kepuasan Konsumen terhadap Loyalitas Konsumen Nivea For Men di Kota Banda Aceh
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025) • DOI: 10.63447/jmt.v2i1.1377
Kepuasan Nasabah Sebagai Mediasi Pada Pengaruh Benefits Offered Dan Penanganan Keluhan Terhadap Loyalitas
Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025) • DOI: 10.63447/jmt.v2i2.1593
Penerapan Artificial Intelligence (AI) untuk Meningkatkan Efisiensi Operasional di Perusahaan Manufaktur: Studi Kasus PT. XYZ
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024) • DOI: 10.63447/jmt.v1i1.773
Membangun Smart City di Indonesia Tantangan dan Peluang: Studi Kasus di Kota Bada Aceh
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024) • DOI: 10.63447/jmt.v1i1.774
Ketahanan Kewirausahaan dalam Kondisi Konflik dan Rentan serta Peran Kewirausahaan Mandiri Lulusan dalam Usaha Kecil: Studi Kasus pada Lembaga Pendidikan Tinggi di Indonesia
Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025) • DOI: 10.63447/jmt.v2i2.1547