Fenomena Gerakan Indonesia Tanpa Pacaran Sebagai Kelompok Sub-Culture Aktivisme Keagamaan
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Article Summary
Since its establishment in 2019, the Indonesia Without Dating Movement has been fervently campaigning against the perceived negative consequences of dating and early marriage, positioning it as an absolute solution. La Ode Munafar, the founder and leader, along with the followers of this movement, appear actively engaged in voicing their opinions on the prohibition of dating through social media. The methodology employed involves content analysis of social media publications and coverage from various online media outlets. Recent developments indicate the emergence of controversial subcultural activism within the Indonesia Without Dating Movement, demonstrating symptoms of religious activism. This research reveals several characteristics of subculture within the Indonesia Without Dating Movement, portraying it as a religious activism group. These characteristics include the diffusion network among movement members, a shared identity, the exchange of distinctive meanings, resistance, and marginalization.
Keywords
Article Keywords
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
License: All articles are licensed under 
Haenfler, R. (2013). Subcultures: the basics. Routledge.
Barker, C. (2004). Cultural studies: Teori & praktik. Kreasi Wacana.
Sulaiman, A. (2020). Gerakan Indonesia Tanpa Pacaran (GITP): propaganda and mobilization of youthsâ social praxis. Fikrah: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan, 8(2), 225-42.
TRIDARMANINGRUM, N. A. (2020). EFEKTIVITAS PESAN KAMPANYE INDONESIA TANPA PACARAN TERHADAP MENDORONG MINAT NIKAH MUDA DI KALANGAN GENERASI Z (Studi dilakukan pada Followers Akun Instagram@ Indonesiatanpapacaran) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Mercu Buana).
Cohen, H. (1972). Religion of Reason out of the Sources of Judaism.
Thompson, K. (2005). Moral panics. Routledge.
Hebdige, D. (1979). âSubculture, The Meaning of Styleâ, London and New York, Methuen & Co.
Haenfler, R. (2013). Subcultures: the basics. Routledge.
Fatmawati, F. (2021). Gerakan Indonesia Tanpa Pacaran (Itp): Dari Resepsi Al-Qurâan Dan Hadis Hingga Konstruksi Sosial. Satya Widya: Jurnal Studi Agama, 4(2), 66-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33363/swjsa.v4i2.767.
Neuman Lawrence, W. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson.
Hodkinson, P. (2002). Goth. Identity, style and subculture. Berg Publishers.
Adisya, E. Gerakan Indonesia Tanpa Pacaran: Menikah solusi paling baik, jangan dipersulit [Internet]. Magdalene; 2018 Apr 3.
Williams, J. P. (2011). Subcultural theory: Traditions and concepts. Polity.
Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance (New York) 1982. Art Worlds (Berkeley).
Cohen, S. (1972). Moral panics and folk devils. London: MacGibbon & Kee, 9.
Dainton, M., & Zelley, E. D. (2022). Applying communication theory for professional life: A practical introduction. Sage publications.
Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities' Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in human behavior, 68, 1-7.
Forsyth, D. R. (2020). Group-level resistance to health mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic: A groupthink approach. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 24(3), 139.
Hall, S., & Jefferson, T. (Eds.). (2006). Resistance through rituals: Youth subcultures in post-war Britain. Routledge.
Kanthawongs, P., Jiwajaroenchai, T., & Boripun, P. (2011). Groupthink in social networking sites. Executive Journal, 31(1), 24-31.
Kanthawongs, P., Jiwajaroenchai, T., & Boripun, P. (2011). Groupthink in social networking sites. Executive Journal, 31(1), 24-31.
Qureshi, I., Bhatt, B., Gupta, S., & Tiwari, A. A. (2020). Causes, symptoms and consequences of social media induced polarization (SMIP). Information Systems Journal, 11.
Hanusch, F., & Nölleke, D. (2019). Journalistic homophily on social media: Exploring journalistsâ interactions with each other on Twitter. Digital Journalism, 7(1), 22-44.
Yim, M. C., & Park, H. S. (2021). The effects of corporate elitism and groupthink on organizational empathy in crisis situations. Public Relations Review, 47(1), 101985.