Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024) • Articles
Open Access

Fenomena Gerakan Indonesia Tanpa Pacaran Sebagai Kelompok Sub-Culture Aktivisme Keagamaan

Rahmalia Wulan Azizah
Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Komunikasi, Universitas Indonesia
Published: January 10, 2024 Pages: 373-382
Original Full-Text Article
Download published version for reading and archiving
Abstract

Since its establishment in 2019, the Indonesia Without Dating Movement has been fervently campaigning against the perceived negative consequences of dating and early marriage, positioning it as an absolute solution. La Ode Munafar, the founder and leader, along with the followers of this movement, appear actively engaged in voicing their opinions on the prohibition of dating through social media. The methodology employed involves content analysis of social media publications and coverage from various online media outlets. Recent developments indicate the emergence of controversial subcultural activism within the Indonesia Without Dating Movement, demonstrating symptoms of religious activism. This research reveals several characteristics of subculture within the Indonesia Without Dating Movement, portraying it as a religious activism group. These characteristics include the diffusion network among movement members, a shared identity, the exchange of distinctive meanings, resistance, and marginalization.

Article Metrics & Downloads Graph
Monthly Download Trends:
Author Biographies
Rahmalia Wulan Azizah Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Komunikasi, Universitas Indonesia

Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Komunikasi, Universitas Indonesia, Kota Depok, Provinsi Jawa Barat, Indonesia

How to Cite
Azizah, R. W. (2024). Fenomena Gerakan Indonesia Tanpa Pacaran Sebagai Kelompok Sub-Culture Aktivisme Keagamaan. Jurnal Indonesia : Manajemen Informatika Dan Komunikasi, 5(1), 373-382. https://doi.org/10.35870/jimik.v5i1.498
License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .

  • Share: You are free to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format.
  • Adapt: You are free to remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially.
  • Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
Copyright & Retention: Authors retain copyright without restrictions and grant this journal the right of first publication under an open-access model. The journal retains non-exclusive publishing rights for archiving, indexing, and scholarly dissemination.

References
Total: 25 References
  1. Chu, D. (2010). In search of prosumption: Youth and the new media in Hong Kong. First Monday. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i2.2772.
  2. Haenfler, R. (2013). Subcultures: the basics. Routledge.
  3. Barker, C. (2004). Cultural studies: Teori & praktik. Kreasi Wacana.
  4. Sulaiman, A. (2020). Gerakan Indonesia Tanpa Pacaran (GITP): propaganda and mobilization of youths’ social praxis. Fikrah: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan, 8(2), 225-42.
  5. TRIDARMANINGRUM, N. A. (2020). EFEKTIVITAS PESAN KAMPANYE INDONESIA TANPA PACARAN TERHADAP MENDORONG MINAT NIKAH MUDA DI KALANGAN GENERASI Z (Studi dilakukan pada Followers Akun Instagram@ Indonesiatanpapacaran) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Mercu Buana).
  6. Cohen, H. (1972). Religion of Reason out of the Sources of Judaism.
  7. Thompson, K. (2005). Moral panics. Routledge.
  8. Hebdige, D. (1979). „Subculture, The Meaning of Style”, London and New York, Methuen & Co.
  9. Haenfler, R. (2013). Subcultures: the basics. Routledge.
  10. Fatmawati, F. (2021). Gerakan Indonesia Tanpa Pacaran (Itp): Dari Resepsi Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis Hingga Konstruksi Sosial. Satya Widya: Jurnal Studi Agama, 4(2), 66-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33363/swjsa.v4i2.767.
  11. Neuman Lawrence, W. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson.
  12. Hodkinson, P. (2002). Goth. Identity, style and subculture. Berg Publishers.
  13. Adisya, E. Gerakan Indonesia Tanpa Pacaran: Menikah solusi paling baik, jangan dipersulit [Internet]. Magdalene; 2018 Apr 3.
  14. Williams, J. P. (2011). Subcultural theory: Traditions and concepts. Polity.
  15. Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance (New York) 1982. Art Worlds (Berkeley).
  16. Cohen, S. (1972). Moral panics and folk devils. London: MacGibbon & Kee, 9.
  17. Dainton, M., & Zelley, E. D. (2022). Applying communication theory for professional life: A practical introduction. Sage publications.
  18. Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities' Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in human behavior, 68, 1-7.
  19. Forsyth, D. R. (2020). Group-level resistance to health mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic: A groupthink approach. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 24(3), 139.
  20. Hall, S., & Jefferson, T. (Eds.). (2006). Resistance through rituals: Youth subcultures in post-war Britain. Routledge.
  21. Kanthawongs, P., Jiwajaroenchai, T., & Boripun, P. (2011). Groupthink in social networking sites. Executive Journal, 31(1), 24-31.
  22. Kanthawongs, P., Jiwajaroenchai, T., & Boripun, P. (2011). Groupthink in social networking sites. Executive Journal, 31(1), 24-31.
  23. Qureshi, I., Bhatt, B., Gupta, S., & Tiwari, A. A. (2020). Causes, symptoms and consequences of social media induced polarization (SMIP). Information Systems Journal, 11.
  24. Hanusch, F., & Nölleke, D. (2019). Journalistic homophily on social media: Exploring journalists’ interactions with each other on Twitter. Digital Journalism, 7(1), 22-44.
  25. Yim, M. C., & Park, H. S. (2021). The effects of corporate elitism and groupthink on organizational empathy in crisis situations. Public Relations Review, 47(1), 101985.