jpni@stmiki.ac.id 081377790601 Online Submission Open
Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026) • Articles
Open Access

Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Berbantuan AI untuk Pengawasan Obat dan Makanan Berbasis Risiko di Pasar Digital

Ardianto Nugroho
Indonesian Food and Drug Authority image/svg+xml
Published: September 30, 2026 Pages: 1019-1031
Original Full-Text Article
Download published version for reading and archiving
Download PDF
Abstract

Trading through marketplaces expands public access to drugs and food, but it also increases the complexity of oversight because of the large volume of products, sellers, and digital information. This study aims to formulate an artificial intelligence (AI)-supported public participation model that strengthens risk-based drug and food oversight while maintaining the accountability of human regulators. The study employed a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by a review of previous research on digital public participation, artificial intelligence, risk-based oversight, and algorithmic accountability. The study produced the AI-Assisted Public Participation Model (AIPPM), which integrates public reporting, AI-based screening, risk prioritization, regulator verification, oversight action, and public feedback. The model positions the public as a source of regulatory intelligence, AI as an instrument that supports risk detection and prioritization, and human regulators as the final decision-makers. This integration has the potential to improve the reach, speed, and accuracy of oversight priorities in digital commerce without transferring regulatory authority and responsibility to algorithms, in line with the principle “AI detects and prioritizes; humans verify and decide”.

Keywords:
Public Participation Artificial Intelligence Risk-Based Oversight Digital Marketplace Regulator Accountability
Article Metrics & Downloads Graph
Monthly Download Trends:
Author Biographies
Ardianto Nugroho Indonesian Food and Drug Authority

Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan, Kota Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, Indonesia

How to Cite
Nugroho, A. (2026). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Berbantuan AI untuk Pengawasan Obat dan Makanan Berbasis Risiko di Pasar Digital. Jurnal Pengabdian Nasional (JPN) Indonesia, 7(3), 1019-1031. https://doi.org/10.63447/jpni.v7i3.2048
License

This work is licensed under a Copyright (c) 2026 Ardianto Nugroho .

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .

  • Share: You are free to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format.
  • Adapt: You are free to remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially.
  • Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
Copyright & Retention: Authors retain copyright without restrictions and grant this journal the right of first publication under an open-access model. The journal retains non-exclusive publishing rights for archiving, indexing, and scholarly dissemination.

References
Total: 21 References
  1. Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan. (2024). Peraturan Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Nomor 14 Tahun 2024 tentang pengawasan obat dan makanan yang diedarkan secara daring. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/297143/perka-bpom-
  2. Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan. (2025a). Peraturan Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Nomor 16 Tahun 2025 tentang pengawasan sediaan farmasi dan pangan olahan melalui peran serta masyarakat. https://peraturan.go.id/id/peraturan-bpom-no-16-tahun-2025
  3. Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan. (2025b). Peraturan Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Nomor 30 Tahun 2025 tentang perubahan atas Peraturan Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Nomor 14 Tahun 2024 tentang pengawasan obat dan makanan yang diedarkan secara daring. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/335228/peraturan-bpom-no-30-tahun-2025
  4. Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan. (2026, March 5). Top 10 produk obat dan makanan ilegal atau berbahaya yang beredar di marketplace sepanjang tahun 2025 [Siaran pers]. https://www.pom.go.id/siaran-pers/top-10-produk-obat-dan-makanan-ilegal-atau-berbahaya-yang-beredar-di-marketplace-sepanjang-tahun-2025
  5. Busuioc, M. (2021). Accountable artificial intelligence: Holding algorithms to account. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 825–836. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13293
  6. Enarsson, T., Enqvist, L., & Naarttijärvi, M. (2022). Approaching the human in the loop—Legal perspectives on hybrid human/algorithmic decision-making in three contexts. Information & Communications Technology Law, 31(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2021.1958860
  7. Gattepaille, L. M., et al. (2020). Prospective evaluation of adverse event recognition systems in Twitter: Results from the Web-RADR project. Drug Safety, 43, 797–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-020-00942-3
  8. Goldberg, D. M., Khan, S., Zaman, N., Gruss, R. J., & Abrahams, A. S. (2022). Text mining approaches for postmarket food safety surveillance using online media. Risk Analysis, 42(8), 1749–1768. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33314327/
  9. Green, B. (2022). The flaws of policies requiring human oversight of government algorithms. Computer Law & Security Review, 45, Article 105681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105681
  10. Huang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, R., & Min, J. (2022). Analysis and recognition of food safety problems in online ordering based on reviews text mining. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022, Article 4209732. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4209732
  11. Jahangir, R., Zulaikha, S., Nagayev, R., & Dewi, I. R. (2026). AI-enabled financial regulation and regulatory governance of AI: A comprehensive bibliometric-systematic literature review. Quality & Quantity. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-026-03010-7
  12. Jia, L., Gupta, S., Yan, C., Wang, Y., & Shen, A. (2025). From detection to resolution: Using machine learning to identify food safety risks and solutions in online consumer reviews. European Journal of Marketing. https://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/id/eprint/26111/
  13. Krewinkel, A., et al. (2016). Concept for automated computer-aided identification and evaluation of potentially non-compliant food products traded via electronic commerce. Food Control, 61, 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.09.039
  14. Kumar, S., Datta, S., Singh, V., Datta, D., Singh, S. K., & Sharma, R. (2024). Applications, challenges, and future directions of human-in-the-loop learning. IEEE Access, 12. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10530996
  15. Lazaros, K., Vrahatis, A. G., & Kotsiantis, S. (2026). Human-in-the-loop artificial intelligence: A systematic review of concepts, methods, and applications. Entropy, 28(4), Article 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28040377
  16. Lee, C. K. H. (2025). Can customers be hygiene inspectors? Leveraging social media to support health authorities in food safety monitoring. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 125(7), 2371–2391. https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/abs/pii/S0263557725000053
  17. Li, Y., Jimeno Yepes, A., & Xiao, C. (2020). Combining social media and FDA adverse event reporting system to detect adverse drug reactions. Drug Safety. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-020-00943-2
  18. Maharana, A., et al. (2019). Detecting reports of unsafe foods in consumer product reviews. JAMIA Open, 2(3), 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz030
  19. Maheshwari, S., & Chatnani, N. N. (2023). Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning-based supervisory technology in financial markets surveillance: A review of literature. FIIB Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145231189990
  20. Marchetti, B. (2021). La garanzia dello human in the loop alla prova della decisione amministrativa algoritmica. BioLaw Journal—Rivista di BioDiritto, (2), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-828
  21. van Stekelenborg, J., et al. (2019). Recommendations for the use of social media in pharmacovigilance: Lessons from IMI WEB-RADR. Drug Safety, 42(12), 1393–1407. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31446567/.