Perbandingan Algoritma Klasifikasi Decision Tree, Random Forest, dan Naive Bayes dalam Prediksi Kelulusan Mahasiswa
Original Full-Text Article
Download published version for reading and archivingAbstract
Timely graduation is one of the important indicators of academic success of universities. However, the student monitoring process still faces obstacles in identifying students who have the potential to not graduate on time. This study offers a solution in the form of applying machine learning to predict graduation status while comparing the most effective algorithms. The research uses 750 data of students of the Informatics Study Program batch 2017 – 2021 sourced from the Academic Information System. The research methods include data preprocessing, handling missing values and outliers, encoding, normalization, forming Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Naïve Bayes models, as well as evaluation using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC-ROC. The results of the study show that Random Forest provides the best performance with an accuracy of 91.33%, precision of 90.48%, recall of 93.42%, F1-score of 91.93%, and an AUC-ROC of 0.952. Decision Tree obtained an accuracy of 84.67%, while Naïve Bayes was 80.00%. The Friedman test resulted in a value of p = 0.015 which showed a significant difference in performance. Thus, Random Forest is the best algorithm for predicting student graduation in this research dataset and has the potential to support academic early warning systems.
Keywords:
Author Biographies
Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Pamulang, Kota Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Indonesia.
Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Pamulang, Kota Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Indonesia.
Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Pamulang, Kota Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Indonesia.
Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Pamulang, Kota Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Indonesia.
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Copyright (c) 2026 Sartika Lina Mulani Sitio, Susanna Dwi Yulianti Kusuma, Hidayatullah Al Islami, Mukti Andrianto .
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .
- Share: You are free to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format.
- Adapt: You are free to remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially.
- Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
References
Total: 20 References- Atika, P. D. (2026). A comparative study of machine learning-based student dropout risk prediction. Piksel Journal, 14(225), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.33558/piksel.v14i1.12299.
- Bennemann, B., Schwartz, B., Giesemann, J., & Lutz, W. (2022). Predicting patients who will drop out of out-patient psychotherapy using machine learning algorithms. British Journal of Psychiatry, 220(4), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2022.17.
- Bischl, B., Binder, M., Lang, M., Pielok, T., Richter, J., Coors, S., Thomas, J., Ullmann, T., Becker, M., Boulesteix, A. L., Deng, D., & Lindauer, M. (2023). Hyperparameter optimization: Foundations, algorithms, best practices, and open challenges. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 13(2), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1484.
- Cohausz, L. (2022). When probabilities are not enough - A framework for causal explanations of student success models. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 14(3), 52–75. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7304800.
- Demšar, J. (2006). Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7, 1–30.
Similar Articles
Articles sharing related keywords and machine learning classifications: