Evaluasi dan Redesain UI/UX pada Aplikasi Web Young on Top
Main Article Content
Abstract
Article Summary
The youth community plays a vital role in supporting the career development of young people. In this context, the user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) of the Young On Top web application play a crucial role. The app experienced UI/UX-related challenges, such as issues with image size, information completeness, and layout inconsistencies, which directly impacted user confusion. The research method used involved a usability evaluation with the System Usability Scale (SUS) as well as interviews with participants, both new and experienced users. The redesign focused on improving the layout, color consistency, and adding important information on various pages such as registration, events, career, shop, and articles. These changes significantly improved the appearance and user experience. This research emphasizes the importance of evaluation and improvement in UI/UX to improve the quality and user satisfaction of the Young On Top web application. Thus, the alignment between users' needs and ease of interaction with the application can be optimally realized.
Keywords
Article Keywords
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Athallah, M. F. (2024). Evaluasi dan Redesain UI/UX dengan Metode A/B Testing Pada Aplikasi Web Upulsa. com (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Indonesia).
Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” Usability Scale. Usability Evaluation in INdustry/Taylor and Francis.
Crowther, M. S., Keller, C. C., & Waddoups, G. L. (2004). Improving the quality and effectiveness of computer‐mediated instruction through usability evaluations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 289-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00390.x.
Fariyanto, F., Suaidah, S., & Ulum, F. (2021). Perancangan aplikasi pemilihan kepala desa dengan metode ux design thinking (Studi kasus: kampung kuripan). Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi, 2(2), 52-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33365/jtsi.v2i2.853.
Galitz, W. O. (2007). The essential guide to user interface design: an introduction to GUI design principles and techniques. John Wiley & Sons.
Garrett, J. J. (2022). The elements of user experience. マイナビ出版.
Shirvanadi, E. C. (2021). Perancangan Ulang UI/UX Situs E-Learning Amikom Center Dengan Metode Design Thinking (Studi Kasus: Amikom Center).
Utami, N. W., Arthana, I. K. R., & Darmawiguna, I. G. M. (2020). Evaluasi Usability Pada E-Learning Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Dengan Metode Usability Testing. Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Teknik Informatika: JANAPATI, 9(1), 107-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/janapati.v9i1.23663.
WULANDARI, S. (2022). Evaluasi Dan Perancangan Ulang User Interface (Ui) Dan User Experience (Ux) Pada Wesbite Sintesis+ Menggunakan Pendekatan User Centered Design (Ucd), Eye Tracking & System Usability Scale (Sus).
Ziqri, A., Abi Riestianto, A., & Wardhana, A. C. (2023). Evaluasi User Experience Aplikasi Google Meet Menggunakan Metode Usability Testing. Journal ICTEE, 3(2), 20-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33365/jictee.v3i2.2603.