Strategi Komunikasi Pemerintah dalam Implementasi Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) : Studi Kasus SMKN 1 Jogonalan
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Article Summary
The Free Nutritious Meal Program (MBG) is implemented as a government effort to improve nutrition, health, and reduce stunting rates in Indonesia. This program has been running for approximately ten months, but during its implementation, several cases of poisoning were found in several areas that raised some concerns for the community, especially for students and parents who received MBG. This study focuses on the communication process theory according to Effendy including communicators, messages, channels, communicants, and effects. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach in the form of specific interviews with the Nutrition Fulfillment Service Unit (SPPG) Lumbung Karya Nusantara Plawikan, teachers, and students at SMKN 1 Jogonalan, Klaten Regency. The author used purposive sampling in selecting key informants who were considered to have the most knowledge and in-depth information about MBG, including the head of SPPG, six students who received MBG, and the teacher in charge of MBG, then the information was processed with thematic analysis. The research results found that there are still several aspects of communication that have not been implemented, such as the school as the communicator has not delivered an official message to students and parents and social media as a channel to provide information on the MBG program to students and parents whose information validity is considered lacking, thus raising concerns about the MBG program. Several of these findings indicate the need for increased socialization of the MBG program that is valid, a variety of digital and conventional content and adjustments to further communication strategies for the government or related institutions. This research emphasizes the importance of transparent, fast, and empathy-oriented public communication, especially social policies that touch people's lives. The results of this study are expected to be a consideration for the government and related institutions in developing more effective communication programs, especially the MBG program.
Keywords
Article Keywords
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
License: All articles are licensed under 
Ade Novia Maulana, & Setyaningrum, V. D. (2022). Literasi digital dalam mencegah penyebaran konten hoaks pada aparatur pemerintah desa. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 1, 1–10.
Agustini, U. (2025). Efektivitas dan tantangan kebijakan Program Makan Bergizi Gratis sebagai intervensi pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Kiprah Pendidikan, 4(3), 362–368. https://doi.org/10.33578/kpd.v4i3.p362-368.
Alfathin Rangkuti, Z., & Ridwan Rangkuti, M. (2021). Komunikasi kebijakan publik dalam implementasi program e-parking Kota Medan. Kalijaga Journal of Communication, 3(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.14421/kjc.32-04.2021.
Allain-Dupré, D. (2018). Assigning responsibilities across levels of government: Trends, challenges, and guidelines for policy-makers.
Amril, A., & Sazali, H. (2024). Formulasi regulasi dan kebijakan komunikasi dalam pelaksanaan program pembangunan: Studi pada program makan bergizi gratis. Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Deli Serdang, Indonesia.
Chaniago, S. H., Purnamasari, H., & Ramdani, R. (2025). Strategi komunikasi pemerintah dalam meningkatkan transparansi keuangan desa Wadas Kabupaten Karawang. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 11(1).
Dzakiyah, A. N., Andryandy, T., Raftsaal, F., Kuswanto, H., & Syahrevi, I. (2025). Strategi public relations politik pemerintahan Prabowo dalam Program Makan Bergizi Gratis. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i5.2312.
Effendy, O. U. (2017). Ilmu komunikasi: Teori dan praktek. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Faisal, I. (2021). Manajemen komunikasi. Universitas Terbuka.
Friesem, Y. (2019). Teaching truth, lies, and accuracy in the digital age: Media literacy as project-based learning. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 74(2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077695819829962.
Hadi, M., Sudaramanto, B., Ramadhan, H., & Hidayat, R. (2024). Analisa strategi komunikasi krisis program makan siang gratis. Universitas Sahid Jakarta dan IISIP Jakarta.
Hadi, S. P. (2023). Pemahaman literasi digital penyebab munculnya hoaks. Jurnal Karya untuk Masyarakat (JKuM), 4(2), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.36914/jkum.v4i2.962.
Hamad, I. (2024). Perencanaan program komunikasi. Universitas Terbuka.
Jahedi, M., Abdullah, F. S., & Mukundan, J. (2015). An overview of focal approaches of critical discourse analysis. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 2(4), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.2n.4p.28.
Nina, H., & Syam, W. (2023). Konsep dasar dan strategi perencanaan.
Nurbani, S. (2023). Komunikasi antarpribadi. Universitas Terbuka.
Pratiwi, I. Y. R. (2022). Hoax news identification using machine learning model from online media in Bahasa Indonesia. MATRIX: Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi Dan Informatika, 12(2), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.31940/matrix.v12i2.58-67.
Rahmawati, A., Halimah, N., Karmawan, K., & Setiawan, A. A. (2024). Optimalisasi teknik wawancara dalam penelitian field research melalui pelatihan berbasis participatory action research pada mahasiswa lapas pemuda kelas IIA Tangerang. Jurnal Abdimas Prakasa Dakara, 4(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.37640/japd.v4i2.2100.
Rahmawati, F., Mulyawan, R., & Afrilia, U. A. (2025). Komunikasi pemerintahan dalam implementasi gerakan aksi bergizi serentak di Sekolah Menengah Atas Karanganyar. Universitas Padjadjaran.
Ramirez, J. D., & Lepez, C. O. (2023). The social construction of reality. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia - Serie de Conferencias, 2. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2023457.
Sa’adah, F. (2024). Strategi komunikasi pemerintah dalam mensosialisasikan bantuan pangan. Journal Of Social Science Research, 4.
Sarjito, A. (2024). Free nutritious meal program as a human resource development strategy to support national defence. International Journal Administration, Business & Organization, 5(5), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.61242/ijabo.24.454.
Setyawan, E., Rianto, K. W., Sugihartanto, R. A. P., & Ibrahim, M. (2025). Analisis wacana berita hoaks tentang Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) menggunakan pendekatan socio-cognitive Teun A. van Dijk. Jurnal Audiens, 6(2), 254–277. https://doi.org/10.18196/jas.v6i2.607.
Suhendra, S., & Pratiwi, F. S. (2024). Peran komunikasi digital dalam pembentukan opini publik: Studi kasus media sosial. Iapa Proceedings Conference, 293. https://doi.org/10.30589/proceedings.2024.1059.
Tandoc, E. C., Ling, R., Westlund, O., Duffy, A., Goh, D., & Wei, L. Z. (2017). Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: A conceptual framework. New Media & Society, 20(8), 2745–2763. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817731756.
Tully, M., Vraga, E. K., & Smithson, A.-B. (2018). News media literacy, perceptions of bias, and interpretation of news. Journalism, 21(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918805262.
Yu, W., & Yan, Q. (2024). Reasons to fight: Preliminary results on motivations to combat fake news. Information Research, 29(2), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.47989/ir292596.