Komparasi Penerapan Algoritma C4.5 dan Naïve Bayes untuk Ketepatan Waktu Pengiriman Barang Pada PT. Rtrans Logistik Artamandiri
Original Full-Text Article
Download published version for reading and archivingAbstract
The logistics industry faces significant challenges in maintaining the punctual delivery of goods, which is a critical factor in enhancing customer satisfaction and reducing operational costs. This research aims to compare the effectiveness of the C4.5 and Naïve Bayes algorithms in analyzing the factors that influence delivery punctuality at PT. Rtrans Logistics Artamandiri. A dataset comprising 1,000 shipping records and 13 relevant attributes was utilized to assess each algorithm’s predictive performance in supporting decision-making processes related to delivery efficiency. The findings reveal that the C4.5 algorithm achieves a higher accuracy of 95.00%, compared to the Naïve Bayes algorithm, which reached an accuracy of 91.00%. Furthermore, this study highlights the importance of selecting the appropriate algorithm in logistics management to enhance operational efficiency and customer satisfaction. The results of this research are expected to provide a foundation for strategic decision-making in the field of goods delivery, particularly in optimizing delivery timeliness.
Author Biographies
Program Studi Sistem Informasi, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komputer Cipta Karya Informatika, Kota Jakarta Timur, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, Indonesia
Program Studi Sistem Informasi, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komputer Cipta Karya Informatika, Kota Jakarta Timur, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, Indonesia
How to Cite
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .
- Share: You are free to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format.
- Adapt: You are free to remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially.
- Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
References
Total: 26 References- Alkhalifi, Y., Zumarniansyah, A., Ardianto, R., Hardi, N., & Augustia, A. E. (2020). Comparison of Naive Bayes algorithm and C4.5 algorithm in classification of poor communities receiving non-cash food assistance in Wanasari Village, Karawang Regency. Jurnal Techno Nusa Mandiri, 17(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.33480/techno.v17i1.1191
- Amril Mutoi Siregar, S. K. M. K. D. A. N. A. P. S. K. M. K. (n.d.). Data mining: Pengolahan data menjadi informasi dengan RapidMiner. CV Kekata Group. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=rTlmDwAAQBAJ
- Anggi Trifani, A., Perdana Windarto, A., & Qurniawan, H. (2022). Penerapan data mining klasifikasi C4.5 dalam menentukan tingkat stres mahasiswa akhir. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Teknik, 1(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurritek.v1i2.414
- Arwanda, F. P., Hannie, & Dermawan, B. A. (2021). Komparasi penerapan forward selection pada algoritma C4.5 dan Naïve Bayes untuk memprediksi kompetensi karyawan (Studi kasus: PT. XYZ). Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 7(3), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4970680
- Azhari, M., Situmorang, Z., & Rosnelly, R. (2021). Perbandingan akurasi, recall, dan presisi klasifikasi pada algoritma C4.5, random forest, SVM, dan Naive Bayes. Jurnal Media Informatika Budidarma, 5(2), 640. https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v5i2.2937
Similar Articles
Articles sharing related keywords and machine learning classifications:
Most read articles by the same author(s)
Other papers published by author(s) in this journal: