Implementasi Metode Bagging dan Teknik Discretization pada Algoritma Machine Learning untuk Memprediksi Status Stunting pada Anak Balita
Original Full-Text Article
Download published version for reading and archivingAbstract
Stunting is one of the problems of toddler growth, making toddlers susceptible to disease. Efforts to prevent stunting with routine checks every month. Posyandu Sukasejati is a facility for routinely checking the growth of toddlers, but data collection requires early stunting analysis to help health workers reduce the number of stunting statuses in toddlers. Previous research on stunting prediction using the Naive Bayes Machine Learning algorithm has been carried out, but the level of accuracy is still low, so accuracy improvement techniques are needed to provide accurate information. The purpose of the study was to implement the Bagging method to improve accuracy and the discretization technique to change continuous attributes to categorical in the Naïve Bayes Machine Learning algorithm in predicting stunting in toddlers, the results of the study showed an increase in accuracy, recall, and precision using a combination of the Bagging method and the Naïve Bayes algorithm, namely accuracy of 100% increased by 5.83% compared to using the Naïve Bayes algorithm alone, which was 94.17% and an increase in recall and precision results of 28.33%.
Author Biographies
Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Pelita Bangsa, Kabupaten Bekasi, Provinsi Jawa Barat, Indonesia.
Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Pelita Bangsa, Kabupaten Bekasi, Provinsi Jawa Barat, Indonesia.
How to Cite
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .
- Share: You are free to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format.
- Adapt: You are free to remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially.
- Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
References
Total: 25 References- Baron, G., & Stańczyk, U. (2021). Standard vs. non-standard cross-validation: Evaluation of performance in a space with structured distribution of datapoints. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 1245-1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.128.
- Cui, G., Zhang, Y., Tao, H., Man, S., & Chen, H. (2024). Optimised prediction of tunnel fire heat release rate using the ResNet18_2CLSTM model with bagging for multimodal data. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 63, 105268.
- Dessiaming, T. Z., Anraeni, S., & Pomalingo, S. (2022). College Academic Data Analysis Using Data Visualization. Jurnal Teknik Informatika (Jutif), 3(5), 1203-1212. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jutif.2022.3.5.310.
- Fatmawati, D., Trisnawati, W., Jumaryadi, Y., & Triyono, G. (2023). Klasifikasi Tingkat Kepuasan Penggunaan Layanan Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Decision Tree. KLIK: Kajian Ilmiah Informatika dan Komputer, 3(6), 1056-1062. https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v3i6.803.
- Gu, Y. (2023). Exploring the application of teaching evaluation models incorporating association rules and weighted naive Bayesian algorithms. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 20, 200297.
Similar Articles
Articles sharing related keywords and machine learning classifications: