Politik Identitas dalam Ruang Demokrasi Indonesia: Dinamika, Strategi, dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kohesi Sosial
Original Full-Text Article
Download published version for reading and archivingAbstract
This study examines the construction and mobilization of identity politics in Indonesia's democratic space and its implications for social cohesion and the quality of democracy. Using a qualitative approach with a case study method, this study found that identity politics in Indonesia is consciously utilized by various political actors through symbols, religious and cultural narratives, and social media. Identity politics has been proven to form affectation-based political loyalty, but it has an impact on the exclusion, polarization, and delegitimization of democratic institutions. Phenomena such as the 2017 Jakarta Regional Elections and the 2019 General Election are concrete examples of how identity is used as an effective electoral strategy, but risks deepening social tensions. Nevertheless, identity politics also has constructive potential if it is managed within the framework of inclusive local culture and supported by Islamic communication principles such as tasamuh (tolerance), shura (deliberation), and ukhuwah (brotherhood). These values are able to form a harmonious space for dialogue and encourage fair political participation. This study recommends the need to strengthen multicultural education, public policies that support social integration, and the mainstreaming of cross-identity communication ethics as the foundation of a sustainable, inclusive, and upholding democracy that upholds Bhinneka Tunggal Ika.
Author Biographies
Program Studi Doktor Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam, Fakultas Dakwah dan Komunikasi, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Kabupaten Deli Serdang, Provinsi Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.
Program Studi Doktor Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam, Fakultas Dakwah dan Komunikasi, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Kabupaten Deli Serdang, Provinsi Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.
How to Cite
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .
- Share: You are free to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format.
- Adapt: You are free to remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially.
- Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
References
Total: 27 References- Agustino, L., Sylviana, M., & Silas, J. (2023). INSTITUSIONALISASI DAN KETAHANAN PARTAI DALAM DEMOKRASI ELEKTORAL INDONESIA:: Studi Kasus Partai Demokrasi Indonesia Perjuangan. Epistemik: Indonesian Journal of Social and Political Science, 4(1), 105-130. https://doi.org/10.57266/epistemik.v4i1.129.
- Bennett, S., Moon, D. S., Pearce, N., & Whiting, S. (2021). Labouring under a delusion? Scotland’s national questions and the crisis of the Scottish Labour Party. Territory, Politics, Governance, 9(5), 656-674. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1743204.
- Boyer, M., Aaldering, L., & Lecheler, S. (2020). Motivated reasoning in identity politics: group status as a moderator of political motivations. Political Studies, 70(2), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720964667.
- Busyro, B., Ananda, A., & Adlan, T. (2019). Moderasi Islam (wasathiyyah) di tengah pluralisme agama Indonesia. Jurnal Fuaduna, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30983/fuaduna.v3i1.1152.
- Calhoun, C. (1994). Social theory and the politics of identity.
Similar Articles
Articles sharing related keywords and machine learning classifications:
Most read articles by the same author(s)
Other papers published by author(s) in this journal: